DIE BIBEL ALS PDF
PDF Bible: Download the Bible here as a PDF, Public Domain ebook and Podcast. This free version of the Holy Bible is the King James Edition English PDF. Luther Bibel PDF. Deutsch. deu. sppn.info letter size ( pages) · sppn.info A4 size ( pages) · sppn.info 6 in x 9 in 9 point ( In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of.
|Language:||English, Spanish, German|
|Genre:||Fiction & Literature|
|ePub File Size:||MB|
|PDF File Size:||MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
f^^ ^ %R ^^ % ii 1%?r %TT '^T^ %T^ ^Wr^ %K ^^ ^. W(^ '^TT ^^ %iit ^Tft^t ^f^5?t ^ ^ % ^^ ^^^^t II \ «I. ^ %TT 'fT ^Wi ^^ '^TT^ ^FT^ HtfTT % ^^^ %T^ ^[^ iK %r. Dez. Und Gott nannte das Trockene Erde, und die Sammlung der Wasser nannte er Meer. Und Gott sah, daß es gut war. Und Gott sprach: Es. Publisher Halle: in der Cansteinischen Bibel-Anstalt. Collection .. Their priority is SALES ;, or (Direct PDF re ) ; not Biblical accuracy.
He wears a sumptuous garment of rich golden colors and wears a magnificent sword held by a harness on his shoulder. The handle and the keeper look like fine gold, while the sheath is made of gold and a kind of green velvet. Jonathan wears an astonishing turban with egret. He is dressed in an olive-colored robe with golden fringes and a sumptuous coat enhanced with gold thread. On the left, a cut out shape is the Ezel rock where David told Jonathan to wait for him. At the back stretches a city that could be Jerusalem: houses and a curious circular building surmounted by a dome.
The empty space between the men in the foreground and the city in the background is extremely effective. The merging of the two men reduces the composition to its simplest: a large, strongly form placed before an empty space. This curious staging led the Rembrandt Project members to dis-attribute the work to the Rembrandt in and attribute it to his pupil Ferdinand Bol ,8 be- fore re-attributing it in and Looking at this painting, the spectator is struck at first by the almost paternal gentleness with which Jonathan, portrayed as an elderly man, holds the young David in his arms and the confidence that the latter has in him, letting his head rest on his chest.
Just as Rembrandt has irrevocably changed the way we see 7 Crenshaw, Bankruptcy, Through this posture, he empha- sizes the emotional capacities and humanity of the future king of Israel. Far from the heroic representations, he paints flesh and blood beings, expressing the human condition,12 in an astonishing closeness to those who contemplate them.
It would be bet- ter for me to be there still. So he came to the king and prostrated himself with his face to the ground before the king; and the king kissed Absalom. It was only in that Vladimir Levinson-Lessing 15 finally solved the matter by showing that a few verses before this meeting, Jonathan had given David his garments. Then Jonathan made a covenant with David, because he loved him as his own soul. Jonathan stripped himself of the robe that he was wearing, and gave it to David, and his armor, and even his sword and his bow and his belt.
A Rare Episode in the History of Painting While the story of David and Jonathan contains some very romantic features, it is surprising to note that it has not aroused the interest of artists.
The various episodes have been rarely depicted, and often in a stereotypical way. From the medieval illuminators onwards, artists have always picked the same episode: the last meeting of David and Jonathan.
He bowed three times, and they kissed each other, and wept with each other; David wept the more. On the right David and Jonathan, both represented as youths, embrace each other before bidding farewell.
The most significant depictions of the same embrace can be found in the manuscripts of La Somme le Roi, a text dating from the late 13th century. A Dominican friar, Fig. Brother Laurent, designed it to help prepare penitents for confession and was dedicated to King of France Philip III the Bold, to whom he was confessor. In this last section, Laurent opposes gifts and sins. He takes into con- sideration the virtue of friendship which he opposes to the sin of hatred.
To illustrate friendship, he takes the example of David and Jonathan, to illustrate hate, the one of Saul and David. In the oldest copy in Paris Fig. What is truth? What is an accurate version? Why should you care??
You might think this does not affect you, since this is in English. They have replaced the old historic Greek and Hebrew texts. In the name of being always more accurate, the result has been global spiritual confusion.
ANd what you don't know about the German Bible Society, and its anti-Reformation, anti-historic roots may be a surprise. There are reasons for that, and they are not accidental. Part of the challenge is that if some or even many of the copies or versions of the New Testament are not good, not translated accurately, or not reliable, then which New Testament copies ARE those which are reliable and accurate?
Which are the versions which are 1 accurate ; 2 used and 3 accepted by the earlier Churches? The standard for accurate versions will be the same throughout time, and for all languages: Accurate copies of the New Testament are the ones used by the churches, which either are the manuscripts of the New Testament that were written in Ancient Koine [common] Greek, or that have been accurately translated from those Greek manuscripts into other languages.
It is not that hard to understand. However, what those manuscripts show and demonstrate, is that it is the older translations such as the Geneva Bible and the King James version, that are the most faithful translation. Those translations are the most closely conforming to the text of the Greek manuscripts which date from the time of the Roman empire.
The accurate texts largely reflect the koine greek written in the byzantine type koine used by the early Christians. As time and archeology move foward, they continue to demonstrate the accuracy of the Older versions and the innacuracy of the Modern versions. Older translations were based on decades of serious study ; and preparation ;, deep knowledge ;of the ancient languages ; and a faithful commitment ; to translate ; accurately and faithfully.
The earlier translators ; especially those from through the s WANTED to produce accurate versions because for them, their salvation depended on this read the last chapter of Revelation if you do not understand, which is the last page of the New Testament. Their work was intended to be a personal reflection on their own personal connection ; and relationship ;between themselves and God, through Christ Jesus. With so much depending on accuracy, they took their translation task with great august sincerity ;, and dedication ; to the task.
Modern translators tell a different story.
Their commitment is neither to Christianity, nor to God, and certainly not to the audience, those of us who may read and use a modern translation. Most of the translators of today have one primary goal, their own material comfort and the furtherance of their own academic career.
Translations today abound, and there is one translation for each new flavor. Almost all of the translations are group projects, often sponsored by publishing companies, and not churches, or church denominations. Functionally, in the world of translations of the Bible, there is no oversight and no accountability.
Most of the translators of the versions of today have far less knowledge of the older languages, than the translators of the earlier versions.
Translators today have chosen to base their work on manuscripts rejected by the earlier translators. That is by design and intention ;. The modern translators have little in common with the earlier authentic Christians or Christianity.
In the name of service to Christianity, most of these translators are in fact working against it. The translators, the publishers, and the colleges and universities understand this. Only they hope that this information would not reach the public, lest this should result in lesser sales, and diminished ability to sway people AWAY from historic Christianity.
Modern translators often have gone so far as to reject the very Old and New Testaments that they translate.
They do not believe in the inspiration of the Biblical text, and they do not accept its claims to authenticity. What drives most scholars so-called today in their translation efforts is vanity fame , security paycheck and tenure , and future book sale contracts.
Often, the universities cooperate through lucrative publishing agreements. Accuracy is the last claim of modern versions, and most translators are not only NOT Christians, many translators are openly hostile to the Old and New Testaments, and to those who want to follow them. This applies also to those who believe in the sincerity and accuracy of the words of Jesus Christ. Yet their false recent translations are still printed, and the majority of pastors are either willfully ingorant, or voluntarily complicit ; in misleading their own congregations away from truth, accuracy and clarity.
This happens especially in the larger and higher denominations, who have only too joyously departed from their own faith They are happy to lure congregations to sleep and towards a willful neglect of the Eternal consequences, and happy for the Pastor's decisions to lead the congregations into falsehoods ; and false doctrines.
The result is that it is hard, if not impossible for most people who attend churches, to truly know and understand ; what it means to have Eternal Life, and to learn HOW this may be obtained. Don't kid yourself, many pastors today don't give a damn about your eternal soul. Let it sink in. Understand the implications of what this can mean for you. And if you are in the congregation, and you are among the psychologically paralyzed, if you are among the hopelessly confused, if you are one of those who can't figure out why your prayers don't travel farther than the ceiling, then so much the better!
After all, this means that you are one more who does NOT know which questions to ask ;, one more who does not have the courage to find out, and one more sheep who will simply STAY in the church pew, and keep absorbing more confusion, while you do nothing to prevent your own slide into despair.
In real terms, this will translate into one MORE conversation that a pastor can avoid ;, and one more afternoon, for a great game of golf. While you can argue that other options may exist and they do , the question remains: So if you are happy, then sorry to have interfered with your frog-slowly-simmering-in-the-hot-water experience. There are those who just want to feel good. They are not seeking truth, and they are not interested in God or in knowing Him. They just want to feel good, and use religion to get them there.
They have no understanding of the state of their soul, nor do they really care. The idea that this time period in which you exist, is an opportunity for you to prepare for an afterlife where you will actually exist forever, somehere, is not something that really occured.
Those who do not take God seriously should not be surprised that God does not take them seriously. A relationship is a two-way street. But if you decide that you want to wake up and do something in addition to earnest prayer to God, the first step for you Might be to read an actual New Testament which was translated by those who were the faithful, instead of a modern version, translated by the politically connected. If these facts are true, and they are , would you prefer to not be told, and instead become spiritually deceived?
Would you not have a better chance of accessing the potential of your reconciliation with God, if you knew how the books that he had entrusted to humans, had been mishandled, thanks to false leaders?
Would you not wish that someone was willing to share, so that you would be able to find accurate versions of the Old and New Testament, so that you could start connecting to God, as He intended it?
The truth is out there, for those who have the courage and willingness to seek. The New Testament is the most copied book in the history of the world.
Westcott and Hort lived in the s, were given positions as chaplains to the official Royal family of the British Empire, and were corrupt Anglican academics who gave the anglican church a new false collation assemblage of the Greek Text, and then passed their new False translation to the rest of the church, as IF their version were an improvement.
It was not. It was a corruption ; but they were able to convince many ; including Tregelles a partner of Nestle and the Bible societies to begin to use their Nestle-Westcott-Hort false version of the greek New Testament, to be used for translation of the Bible into other languages. Eventually, most denominations allowed themselves to be misled and jumped on board, from the Lutherans to the Southern Baptists.
The official change with the American Bible Society ; occured in , while it was directed by Daniel Gilman ; nwo ;, The BFBS, the British and Foreign Bible Society ;, was accepted to start using the false greek collated text of Nestle in , with changeovers in other foreign language versions accelerating after the year The British and Foreign Bible society had further confirmed its intention to abandon the historic Ancient Greek received text of the New Testament, when it published a false New Testament — under the imprimatur of the BFBS - using the Westcott-Hort false greek text as a template, in This is simply a matter of history.
These events did not happen overnight. There are many records of the Bibles societies writting to each other ;, and about each other ; in order to try to bring the facts and details ; to the attention of the public ;. And there were authors such as Ebenezer Henderson, whose work is excellent who did act with courage ; and disclosed — as in the case of French versions - some of the false work ; accomplished by those within the Bible societies.
The fact is that most translations today, if they are modern, are innacurate and lacking in spiritual strength, and the foreign translations ; starting in the s need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
People want to simply believe that the Bible societies conducted their translation with integrity and faithfullness both to Christianity and to Jesus Christ. We all would wish to believe this, but facts simply have not and do not support that conclusion ;. It, nevertheless, shows that in antiquity the whale was already known as a fierce animal of the sea. Naboth, too, suf- fered from a change in economic parameters, see Becking, Grapes, — In the seventeenth century, the Leviathan presented as a whale plays a role in literary works.
There are striking parallels with the stage play Lucifer by the Dutch poet Joost van den Vondel.
Leviathan is men- tioned twice, but does not play a special role in the drama: By ancient Tarsus held, or that sea-beast Leviathan, which God of all his works Created hugest that swim the ocean-stream 22 Him, haply slumbering on the Norway foam. Wallowing unwieldy, enormous in their gait, Tempest the ocean. There Leviathan, Hugest of living creatures, on the deep Stretched like a promontory, sleeps or swims, And seems a moving land, and at his gills 23 Draws in, and at his trunk spouts out, a sea.
A new way of looking at reality awoke. Tradition no longer was a convincing argument.
Luther Bibel PDF
The presence of the Leviathan in the Bible was no longer decisive for its real existence. Only fea- tures that could be observed or touched were thought to exist, everything else was part of a fairy-tale world. Since no animals had been seen that fully corre- sponded to the description of the Leviathan in the Book of Job, enlightened peo- ple thought that the animal did not exist.
Some identified the Leviathan with the whale, assuming that the author of the Book of Job exaggerated in his descrip- tion.
Traditional Christians hoped — and some still hope — that the animal will once be found in reality. Milton, Paradise Lost. Such a view is criticized by scholars such as Senter, Dinosaurs. Its story tells of the heroic battle of Captain Ahab against the monstrous whale Moby Dick. The whale, however, wins the battle and gobbles up the captain. The ship that had been on the hunt also drowns in the turbulent waves. Only the narrator Ishmael survives the journey. From having the ba- leen in his mouth, the Fin-Back is sometimes included with the right whale, among 27 a theoretic species denominated Whalebone whales, that is, whales with baleen.
Through this analogy, Moby Dick gets monstrous features. In his movie a whale is seen twice. Shortly before Lilja commits suicide a whale is seen swimming in the water. Later, when the son Roman is fleeing away from home, he passes the skeleton of a whale. He, however, overin- Fig. Hobbes or Invidia For many people, the name Leviathan is connected to Thomas Hobbes — who published — just after the civil war in Great Britain — a political philo- sophy entitled Leviathan.
Hoare, Leviathan. Kondyuk, Sensing, In this interpretation, Leviathan would refer to the trinity of state, church, and capital that de- presses the lives of Kolja and his family as a pars pro toto for all those Russians who are marginalized by the Putin-regime.
At first sight, this seems a convincing interpretation. There is, however, a problem since this interpretation is based on an incorrect reading of Hobbes.
The Bible in Deutsch [German]
I will mention two examples. In the American poet Donald G. Davidson — published an essay Attack on Leviathan in which he criticized the interference of the state. In the criticism against the plans of Barack Obama to con- struct a better system for health-care, the former president is often com- pared with the Leviathan. In that con- nection various cartoons appeared in Fig. This image is very suggestive.
One of the government-offices in Cairo is the Mogamma-building at the Tahrir-square. On the fourteen flours of this huge building, 18, Egyptian civil servants work.
The building stands as a symbol for the extended and slow-function- ing Egyptian bureaucracy. The main character, Ahmed, gets trapped in the corridors of the bureaucracy when he is only asking for a declaration that can help him to move his children to a different school. Being fed up, Ahmed takes the whole building hostage, demanding a portion of kebab for all workers in the building.
The European Union is also often construed as a bureaucratic Leviathan. This became clear in an essay by Hans Magnus Enzensberger33 as well as in the mentality out of which Brexit grew. I have, however, a remark. According to Hobbes, a government is necessary to guard a society against the danger of a war of all against all.
In his view, the existence of the state is based on a set of moral codes that he depicts as natu- ral laws. The organisation and the functioning of any state needs to be an ex- pression of these moral codes such as respect and equality. A state is built on a social contract in which all citizens transfer their right to govern themselves by assigning this right to the state.
In other words, the state as a Leviathan in the writings of Hobbes is a positive entity that safeguards a society. Above, it is made clear that in the med- ieval doctrine of the seven dead- ly sins, Leviathan is the demon connected with invidia, envy, greed and avarice.
According to pope Gregory I invidia was one of the seven cardinal sins. To give a few as one of the seven mortal sins. Enzensberger, Monster. Gibson, Hieronymus Bosch, — It is desire that brings Kolja to the bottom of his vodka bottles.
In all these and other acts they reflect the presence of the Leviathan, the demon of invidia. The Book of Job After the death of Lilya, Kolja meets the local priest on the sidewalk of a simple supermarket.
Kolja has just bought his daily two bottles of vodka. The priest sees his desperation and tries to comfort him by telling the passage about the Leviathan from the book of Job Job 40— He became the victim of a horrible arrangement between God and the Satan.
God agreed to have Job tested: will he give up faith and confidence when his life is made miserable by illness, death and decay? The main part of the book is written in the form of an extended dialogue. Job discusses his situation with three friends. These three interlocutors try to con- vince him that he must be guilty, now that such a great suffering has struck him.
They argue with a combination of the idea of retribution and a reversed form of evidentialism. This ideology is based on the concept of reward: those who are sweet get goodies, who are naughty receive punishment. If my pavement is wet, it must have rained. Inverted evidentialism is, however, a logical fallacy. The sidewalk can have become wet for a very different reason: e. The chilly logic of the three friends obviously is unable to comfort Job.
All fibres in his body oppose their view. During the conversation his position shifts: from acceptance, to complaint, to indictment. On his indictment, God answers Job through a voice in the whirlwind. Bekkering, Leviathan, 1.
However, God ap- plies a detour. The short lecture in world exploration is based on an assumption, namely that of an analogy between the physical world and the human world.
What God wants to say from the whirlwind is that the world is full of beauty and order and that by analogy human life can be full of beauty and order.
However, that cosmic balance is constantly challenged, as is shown in the analogy of the two sea monsters. Unexpectedly, God brings two animals on the stage of the debate: Behemoth and Leviathan. Real animals, such as a hippopotamus and a crocodile, are often assumed to have served as models for the drawing of the two mythological creatures.
In Job 40 this beast is described with the dimensions of an untamable primordial monster, like a dinosaur from the primeval waters: He moves his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his thighs are knit together. His bones are as tubes of brass; his limbs are like bars of iron. He ranks first among the works of God, the One who made him 41 has furnished it with a sword.
Both animals represent the monstrous and diabolic character of evil.
They were chosen by the narrator as images for the dark side of reality. The point at issue is hidden in two questions: Can anyone catch it by its eyes, or pierce its nose with a snare? Can you pull in Leviathan with a hook, and tie down its tongue with a rope?
Can you put a cord through its nose, 42 or pierce its jaw with a hook? No man is capable of that. The primordial forces in nature still exceed our ability.With so much depending on accuracy, they took their translation task with great august sincerity ;, and dedication ; to the task. In this interpretation, Leviathan would refer to the trinity of state, church, and capital that de- presses the lives of Kolja and his family as a pars pro toto for all those Russians who are marginalized by the Putin-regime.
Hoskier Pt 4 ; Most modern versions of the New Testament in other languages yes, but especially in English are based on the work and manuscripts collated assembled by Westcott and Hort. What God wants to say from the whirlwind is that the world is full of beauty and order and that by analogy human life can be full of beauty and order.
Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. This is usually based on the changes of Griesbach. Yet Kittels work are based on falsehoods, fictions, not to mention the errant false Old Testament manuscripts of ben Asher, dated to around years after Christ.
- ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL PATHOLOGY NEVILLE 3RD EDITION PDF
- WILSON AND WALKER BIOCHEMISTRY EBOOK
- FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF MECHANICS IRODOV PDF
- ARM ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE FUNDAMENTALS AND TECHNIQUES EBOOK
- DIE FARBE DER LUST EPUB
- ECET MECHANICAL BOOKS PDF
- METALLICA TAB BOOK PDF
- BERGURU KEPADA ALLAH PDF
- GATE MECHANICAL BOOK PDF